Recently, our firm represented the plaintiff, a Uzbekistan company against the defendant a Chinese company in the first instance of the civil lawsuit over the dispute over the international sale of goods, and the court of first instance fully supported our claims, and ruled that the defendant should refund the payment of goods and pay interest to the plaintiff in total over 26 million yuan, and the plaintiff's attorney's fees should be borne by the defendant in full.
This case involved a dispute over a contract for the international sale of goods, and the countries where the plaintiff’s and defendant's place of business located were both member countries of the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods, and the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods was applied to the trial, rather than the Civil Code of China. There are differences between the provisions of the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods and the Civil Code of China in terms of remedies for breach of contract. Our lawyers carefully and fully studied the facts of the case and the relevant provisions of international convention, put forward justified claims and adduced evidence, which was fully supported by the court of first instance.
This case involved a dispute over a contract for the international sale of goods, and the countries where the plaintiff’s and defendant's place of business located were both member countries of the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods, and the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods was applied to the trial, rather than the Civil Code of China. There are differences between the provisions of the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods and the Civil Code of China in terms of remedies for breach of contract. Our lawyers carefully and fully studied the facts of the case and the relevant provisions of international convention, put forward justified claims and adduced evidence, which was fully supported by the court of first instance.